<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADM To Introduce Podcast Advertising Standards &#038; Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/02/06/podcast-advertising-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/02/06/podcast-advertising-standards/</link>
	<description>Podcasting News features the latest podcast news, along with reviews, hardware and software info, and a podcast directory.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pin Podcast &#124; Pin #82</title>
		<link>http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/02/06/podcast-advertising-standards/#comment-89184</link>
		<dc:creator>Pin Podcast &#124; Pin #82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/02/06/podcast-advertising-standards/#comment-89184</guid>
		<description>[...] Advertising and Sponsorship Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Measurement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advertising and Sponsorship Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Measurement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/02/06/podcast-advertising-standards/#comment-83552</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/02/06/podcast-advertising-standards/#comment-83552</guid>
		<description>Only the podcasting industry would be so silly as to define what need it will serve via committee. The less time we spend trying to talk ourselves into relevancy, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only the podcasting industry would be so silly as to define what need it will serve via committee. The less time we spend trying to talk ourselves into relevancy, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
